Particle Pressure and CMEs: Difference between revisions

From HelioWiki Home Page
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 20: Line 20:
[https://news.uchicago.edu/explainer/what-are-cosmic-rays cosmic rays],
[https://news.uchicago.edu/explainer/what-are-cosmic-rays cosmic rays],
even out to GeV energies.
even out to GeV energies.
We cannot make <i>in situ</i> observations anywhere close to the Sun, and  
We cannot make <i>in situ</i> observations closer than about 10 solar radii to the Sun, and  
the propagation of these "solar cosmic rays" throughout the
the propagation of these "solar cosmic rays" throughout the
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliosphere heliosphere]
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliosphere heliosphere]
Line 27: Line 27:
mechanisms deriving energy from
mechanisms deriving energy from
[https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/sun-corona/en/ coronal magnetic fields].
[https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/sun-corona/en/ coronal magnetic fields].
Therefore SEPs are probably present in the low corona at times.
Most of the magnetic energy is in the low corona, so accelerated particles must be present in the low corona at times.
This Nugget discusses one potential consequence of SEPs near the Sun.
This Nugget discusses the pressure exerted by high-energy particles low in the corona, which can rival
the magnetic pressure.


== The physics and the numbers ==
== The physics and the numbers ==
Line 38: Line 39:
of the plasma, and its effect is to expand the magnetic field in the  
of the plasma, and its effect is to expand the magnetic field in the  
perpendicular direction.
perpendicular direction.
From SEPs observations, we can roughly describe its significance
From SEP event observations, we can roughly quantify its significance relative to
in a quantitative manner.
the magnetic pressure.
A major CME may have a total energy of 10<sup>32</sup> erg, and we could
A major CME may have a total energy of 10<sup>32</sup> erg, and we could conservatively
consider a total SEP energy of 10<sup>30</sup> erg (Ref. [1]).
take 1% as the particle fraction of the total energy (Ref. [1]).
This is then 10<sup>30</sup> erg in particle energy.
In the volume of a shell at 1 R<sub>&#9737;</sub>, 0.1 R<sub>&#9737;</sub>
In the volume of a shell at 1 R<sub>&#9737;</sub>, 0.1 R<sub>&#9737;</sub>
thick and 1 sr in diameter, the particle energy density would correspond
thick and 1 sr in diameter, the particle energy density would correspond
Line 59: Line 61:
strongly suggests that a global shock wave could penetrate closed fields,
strongly suggests that a global shock wave could penetrate closed fields,
as in a coronal  
as in a coronal  
[helmet streamer]
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmet_streamer helmet streamer]
and accelerate particles there.
and accelerate particles there.
This has been borne out by modeling (e.g., Ref. [3]).
This has been borne out by modeling (e.g., Ref. [3]).
Line 75: Line 77:
== Conclusion ==
== Conclusion ==


Non-thermal particle pressure typically has not often been considered in  
Non-thermal particle pressure typically has not been considered in  
modeling CME initiation or propagation in the low corona.
modeling CME initiation or propagation in the low corona.
With or without shock waves, the mechanism seems plausible: an impulsive
With or without shock waves, the mechanism seems plausible: an electrodynamic process
flare accelerates particles, which pressurize the accessible field volume.  
accelerates particles, which pressurize the accessible field volume.  
This drives expansion and creates or augments a CME and its interplanetary
This drives expansion and creates or augments a CME and its interplanetary
aftermath; some of the energy added to expand the field can then return  
aftermath; some of the energy added to expand the field can then return  
Line 84: Line 86:
[https://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/cartoons/cshkp.html CSHKP]
[https://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/cartoons/cshkp.html CSHKP]
process.   
process.   
The important message here is that non-thermal particle pressure can have a
The important message here is that non-thermal particle pressure can have a
powerful effect on magnetic structures in the solar corona in general.  
powerful effect on magnetic structures in the solar corona in general.  
MHD simulations intrinsically cannot paint a complete picture of coronal
MHD simulations intrinsically cannot paint a complete picture of coronal
dynamics because they do not include this basic physics.
dynamics because they do not include this basic physics.
The dramatic discovery soft X-ray detection of dimming at the very
bottom of the corona (e.g., Ref. [3]) should have sent this clear message
already.


== References ==
== References ==
Line 97: Line 95:
[1] [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ESASP.592...67M/abstract "How Efficient are Coronal Mass Ejections at Accelerating Solar Energetic Particles?"]
[1] [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ESASP.592...67M/abstract "How Efficient are Coronal Mass Ejections at Accelerating Solar Energetic Particles?"]


[1] [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997SoPh..175..601D/abstract "EIT and LASCO Observations of the Initiation of a Coronal Mass Ejection"]
[2] [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997SoPh..175..601D/abstract "EIT and LASCO Observations of the Initiation of a Coronal Mass Ejection"]


[3] [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...851...38K "The Acceleration of High-energy Protons at Coronal Shocks: The Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures"]
[3] [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...851...38K "The Acceleration of High-energy Protons at Coronal Shocks: The Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures"]

Latest revision as of 10:13, 24 June 2026


Nugget
Number: 529
1st Author: Hugh HUDSON
2nd Author: Ed CLIVER
Published: June 22, 2026
Next Nugget: TBD
Previous Nugget: White-Light and Lyman-alpha Emissions in Solar Flares: Timing, Timescale, Energy, and Scaling



Introduction

We know about solar energetic particles (SEPS) from many observations from instruments on space probes, and also from ground-based observations such as those of neutron monitors. SEP events occur only intermittently, often following powerful flares, and when they do occur the particle fluxes far exceed those of the cosmic rays, even out to GeV energies. We cannot make in situ observations closer than about 10 solar radii to the Sun, and the propagation of these "solar cosmic rays" throughout the heliosphere remains somewhat mysterious. But we can tell that the highest-energy particles come from acceleration mechanisms deriving energy from coronal magnetic fields. Most of the magnetic energy is in the low corona, so accelerated particles must be present in the low corona at times. This Nugget discusses the pressure exerted by high-energy particles low in the corona, which can rival the magnetic pressure.

The physics and the numbers

The pressure exerted by high-energy particles basically reflects the Lorentz force, and so it is anisotropic. This distinguishes it from the gas pressure exerted by the thermal core of the plasma, and its effect is to expand the magnetic field in the perpendicular direction. From SEP event observations, we can roughly quantify its significance relative to the magnetic pressure. A major CME may have a total energy of 1032 erg, and we could conservatively take 1% as the particle fraction of the total energy (Ref. [1]). This is then 1030 erg in particle energy. In the volume of a shell at 1 R, 0.1 R thick and 1 sr in diameter, the particle energy density would correspond to a magnetic field of 1 G, and is very likely the dominant pressure component in a closed field structure. Note that particle pressure applied to a closed magnetic field would be outward, in opposition to the inward force of magnetic tension.

CME dynamics

Flare-associated CMEs can originate impulsively, in the low corona (Ref. [2]), in which case there is a dramatic and very sudden dimming. Other CMEs may arise from streamer expansion or filament eruption, as shown in Figure 1. The right panel, originally published by Paul Wild, strongly suggests that a global shock wave could penetrate closed fields, as in a coronal helmet streamer and accelerate particles there. This has been borne out by modeling (e.g., Ref. [3]).


Figure 1: Sketches showing global waves emitted from the low corona: left, showing the flank of a wave moving laterally, but somehow not entering closed-field regions; and right, remedying that omission.

Conclusion

Non-thermal particle pressure typically has not been considered in modeling CME initiation or propagation in the low corona. With or without shock waves, the mechanism seems plausible: an electrodynamic process accelerates particles, which pressurize the accessible field volume. This drives expansion and creates or augments a CME and its interplanetary aftermath; some of the energy added to expand the field can then return in the normal CSHKP process. The important message here is that non-thermal particle pressure can have a powerful effect on magnetic structures in the solar corona in general. MHD simulations intrinsically cannot paint a complete picture of coronal dynamics because they do not include this basic physics.

References

[1] "How Efficient are Coronal Mass Ejections at Accelerating Solar Energetic Particles?"

[2] "EIT and LASCO Observations of the Initiation of a Coronal Mass Ejection"

[3] "The Acceleration of High-energy Protons at Coronal Shocks: The Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures"