High Energies in the Inner Heliosphere: Difference between revisions

From HelioWiki Home Page
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hhudson
No edit summary
imported>Hhudson
(completed draft of 258)
Line 25: Line 25:
and even to strike and interact in the
and even to strike and interact in the
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosphere photosphere] itself.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosphere photosphere] itself.
This would be the solar equivalent, not much explored yet, of the
This would be the solar equivalent, not much explored yet, of the  
celebrated [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Størmer Størmer problem]  
celebrated [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Størmer Størmer problem]  
of cosmic-ray transport around the Earth.
of cosmic-ray transport around the Earth.
Line 34: Line 34:
inner heliosphere (please also see the recent Nugget on flare-related
inner heliosphere (please also see the recent Nugget on flare-related
[http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/Solar_Cosmic_Rays,_Neutrons,_and_Fermi_Gamma-Rays particles, neutrons, and gamma-rays].
[http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/Solar_Cosmic_Rays,_Neutrons,_and_Fermi_Gamma-Rays particles, neutrons, and gamma-rays].
Then we discuss one of them, the remarkable cosmic-ray shadow of the Sun and inner heliosphere.
The technique here originally became famous via its use to probe the [http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/marchapril-2008/secrets-of-the-pyramids Pyramids] for hidden burial chambers.


== Processes ==
== Processes ==


Items of interest include some of the following, which we hope to explore in
Items of interest include some of the following, some of which Nuggets have
future Nuggets.
touched on, some of which we hope to explore in future Nuggets, and always
the possibilty of new discovery.


# Nanoflares (our [http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/Quiet_Sun_III upper-limits Nugget]
# Nanoflares (our [http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/Quiet_Sun_III upper-limits Nugget])
# Cosmic-ray impacts (the [Fermi disk source]; see this  
# Cosmic-ray impacts (the [Fermi disk source]; see this [http://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/13708.php movie])
[http://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/13708.php movie])
# Cosmic-ray electrons (an [http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/Scattered_Light:_Inverse_Compton_Scattering_and_Coronal_Hard_X-ray_Sources earlier Nugget])
# Cosmic-ray electrons (an [http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/Scattered_Light:_Inverse_Compton_Scattering_and_Coronal_Hard_X-ray_Sources earli
er Nugget])
# Cosmic-ray shadows (described below)
# Cosmic-ray shadows (described below)
# Flare-associated neutral atoms (Ref. [3])
# Flare-associated neutral atoms (Ref. [3])
# "Solar cosmic rays" and neutrons ([http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/Solar_Cosmic_Rays,_Neutrons,_and_Fermi_Gamma-Rays particles, neutrons, and gamma-rays])
# "Solar cosmic rays" and neutrons ([http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/Solar_Cosmic_Rays,_Neutrons,_and_Fermi_Gamma-Rays particles, neutrons, and gamma-rays])
# Long-duration gamma-ray events (An [http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/Dimmings_and_Sustained_Gamma-Ray_Events earlier Nugget], and
# Long-duration gamma-ray events (An [http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/Dimmings_and_Sustained_Gamma-Ray_Events earlier Nugget], and more to come)
more to come)
# Possible [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_are_known_knowns unknown unknowns]
# [http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2005/07oct_afraid/ Forbush decreases], including those from "backsided" flares
# High-energy neutral particles, including both neutrons and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energetic_neutral_atom neutral atoms], from flares and/or coronal mass ejections
 
== The cosmic-ray shadow of the Sun ==
 
We describe this
[http://www.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/2013/07/11140001.html fascinating subject]
briefly, since it may be unfamiliar to many.
The implication for RHESSI is only that this provides direct evidence that
high-energy (TeV) cosmic rays do make it to the solar surface, and can
therefore be a source of many kinds of secondary radiation.
A [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_ray TeV-range cosmic ray] can
be absorbed by the Sun as it approaches the Earth, but it can also be
deflected by the solar magnetic field (Figure 1).
This deflection obviously will depend upon the coronal magnetic field
in a direct way, for a single particle.
In practice one needs to integrate over many particles to define the
shadow experimentally, and so one must resort to forward modeling via
some parametrized form of the field structure (such as the so-called
[http://www.lmsal.com/~derosa/pfsspack/#sect1.1 PFSS] model.
 
[[File: 258f1.png|thumb|center|600px|Figure 1:
Cartoon illustrating the flow pattern of high-energy (TeV) galactic cosmic
rays impinging on and deflecting around the Sun, on their way to
be detected by
[http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/hfm/CosmicRay/Showers.html air-shower arrays]
on Earth.
]]
 
The detection process for the solar shadow involves determining the arrival directions of cosmic rays at such high energies that they propagate almost on straight lines, but not so straight
that their deflection in the coronal magnetic field becomes un-detectable.
The most efficient way to detect these high-energy primaries is via [http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/hfm/CosmicRay/Showers.html extended air showers], in which a cascade of nuclear and atomic
processes develops following a primary interaction.
The analysis of these multiple secondaries results in quite a precise determination of the arrival direction; viewed as a telescope, the best air-shower arrays nowadays do this much better than one degree.
Figure~2 shows an image from the [http://argo.na.infn.it ARGO-YBJ] collaboration in Tibet.
 
[[File: 258f2.png|thumb|center|600px|Figure 2:
Solar image, at very high significance, from the [http://argo.na.infn.it ARGO-YBJ] collaboration.
Here the color scale is in typical high-energy astrophysics units: sigmas.
One sigma corresponds to the RMS uncertainty of the measurement.
This image has enough statistical weight to allow some exploration of the parameter space for the primary deflections around the Sun.
]]
 
The image shows an object somewhat larger than the solar disk, and not very disk-like.
This reflects the relatively low angular resolution of the current air-shower arrays, but that is improving.
The lunar shadow, not shown here, provides a fiducial reference for direct shadowing without the magnetic effects, and so the telescope-like properties of these systems actually
have a natural means of calibration.
 
== Conclusions ==
 
There are many ways in which high-energy particles can tell us things about the Sun, its corona, and the heliosphere.
In this Nugget we have just shown one of them, the TeV shadow  observed by several ground-based arrays sensitive to this particle energy range.
Reference [4] describes one of the arrays in Tibet, announcing that even two decades ago this technique already provided sufficient signal-to-noise to be able to
detect the solar sector structure (the away and towards regions of interplanetary field.
They could do this exactly in the region where the standard [http://www.lmsal.com/~derosa/pfsspack/#sect1.1 PFSS] models make their gravest errors by construction, and
so in principle this should provide an excellent global test of the evolution of the large-scale solar magnetic field as it connects out into the heliosphere.
Furthermore they can do it with sufficient time resolution to follow the flips and flops of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliospheric_current_sheet interplanetary sector structure].
 
From RHESSI's point of view, we are more interested in the little yellow stars in Figure 1, which show primary cosmic-ray interactions at (or just below) the surface of the Sun.
Can secondary radiations from these particles provide (for example) a bright ring of emission around the solar limb that we could detect?


== References ==
== References ==
Line 56: Line 117:


[2] [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...734..116A "Fermi Large Area Telescope Observations of Two Gamma-Ray Emission Components from the Quiescent Sun"]
[2] [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...734..116A "Fermi Large Area Telescope Observations of Two Gamma-Ray Emission Components from the Quiescent Sun"]
[3] [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...693L..11M "STEREO Observations of Energetic Neutral Hydrogen Atoms During the 2006 December 5 Solar Flare"]
[4] [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...415L.147A "Direct Evidence of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field Effect on the Cosmic-Ray Shadow by the Sun"]

Revision as of 13:25, 23 August 2015


Nugget
Number: 258
1st Author: Hugh Hudson
2nd Author:
Published: 24 August 2015
Next Nugget:
Previous Nugget: A Failed Eruption with a Two-Ribbon Flare



Introduction

How bright is the hard X-ray Sun at solar minimum? We do not know, since even RHESSI has only established upper limits at present (Ref. [1]). Why should it emit any hard X-rays at all? This is easy to answer, at least partially, and there are observations by Fermi at much higher photon energies (Ref. [2]) - indeed, Fermi observes not only the disk of the Sun, but also a diffuse source centered on it. Both of these components originate in galactic cosmic rays with energies high enough to penetrate into the inner heliosphere, and even to strike and interact in the photosphere itself. This would be the solar equivalent, not much explored yet, of the celebrated Størmer problem of cosmic-ray transport around the Earth.

There are other processes in which the heliosphere plays a role in the hard X-ray and gamma-ray emission from quiet Sun. This Nugget lists a few phenomena related to high-energy particles in the inner heliosphere (please also see the recent Nugget on flare-related particles, neutrons, and gamma-rays. Then we discuss one of them, the remarkable cosmic-ray shadow of the Sun and inner heliosphere. The technique here originally became famous via its use to probe the Pyramids for hidden burial chambers.

Processes

Items of interest include some of the following, some of which Nuggets have touched on, some of which we hope to explore in future Nuggets, and always the possibilty of new discovery.

  1. Nanoflares (our upper-limits Nugget)
  2. Cosmic-ray impacts (the [Fermi disk source]; see this movie)
  3. Cosmic-ray electrons (an earlier Nugget)
  4. Cosmic-ray shadows (described below)
  5. Flare-associated neutral atoms (Ref. [3])
  6. "Solar cosmic rays" and neutrons (particles, neutrons, and gamma-rays)
  7. Long-duration gamma-ray events (An earlier Nugget, and more to come)
  8. Possible unknown unknowns
  9. Forbush decreases, including those from "backsided" flares
  10. High-energy neutral particles, including both neutrons and neutral atoms, from flares and/or coronal mass ejections

The cosmic-ray shadow of the Sun

We describe this fascinating subject briefly, since it may be unfamiliar to many. The implication for RHESSI is only that this provides direct evidence that high-energy (TeV) cosmic rays do make it to the solar surface, and can therefore be a source of many kinds of secondary radiation. A TeV-range cosmic ray can be absorbed by the Sun as it approaches the Earth, but it can also be deflected by the solar magnetic field (Figure 1). This deflection obviously will depend upon the coronal magnetic field in a direct way, for a single particle. In practice one needs to integrate over many particles to define the shadow experimentally, and so one must resort to forward modeling via some parametrized form of the field structure (such as the so-called PFSS model.

Figure 1: Cartoon illustrating the flow pattern of high-energy (TeV) galactic cosmic rays impinging on and deflecting around the Sun, on their way to be detected by air-shower arrays on Earth.

The detection process for the solar shadow involves determining the arrival directions of cosmic rays at such high energies that they propagate almost on straight lines, but not so straight that their deflection in the coronal magnetic field becomes un-detectable. The most efficient way to detect these high-energy primaries is via extended air showers, in which a cascade of nuclear and atomic processes develops following a primary interaction. The analysis of these multiple secondaries results in quite a precise determination of the arrival direction; viewed as a telescope, the best air-shower arrays nowadays do this much better than one degree. Figure~2 shows an image from the ARGO-YBJ collaboration in Tibet.

Figure 2: Solar image, at very high significance, from the ARGO-YBJ collaboration. Here the color scale is in typical high-energy astrophysics units: sigmas. One sigma corresponds to the RMS uncertainty of the measurement. This image has enough statistical weight to allow some exploration of the parameter space for the primary deflections around the Sun.

The image shows an object somewhat larger than the solar disk, and not very disk-like. This reflects the relatively low angular resolution of the current air-shower arrays, but that is improving. The lunar shadow, not shown here, provides a fiducial reference for direct shadowing without the magnetic effects, and so the telescope-like properties of these systems actually have a natural means of calibration.

Conclusions

There are many ways in which high-energy particles can tell us things about the Sun, its corona, and the heliosphere. In this Nugget we have just shown one of them, the TeV shadow observed by several ground-based arrays sensitive to this particle energy range. Reference [4] describes one of the arrays in Tibet, announcing that even two decades ago this technique already provided sufficient signal-to-noise to be able to detect the solar sector structure (the away and towards regions of interplanetary field. They could do this exactly in the region where the standard PFSS models make their gravest errors by construction, and so in principle this should provide an excellent global test of the evolution of the large-scale solar magnetic field as it connects out into the heliosphere. Furthermore they can do it with sufficient time resolution to follow the flips and flops of the interplanetary sector structure.

From RHESSI's point of view, we are more interested in the little yellow stars in Figure 1, which show primary cosmic-ray interactions at (or just below) the surface of the Sun. Can secondary radiations from these particles provide (for example) a bright ring of emission around the solar limb that we could detect?

References

[1] "Constraining the Hard X-ray Properties of the Quiet Sun with New RHESSI Observations"

[2] "Fermi Large Area Telescope Observations of Two Gamma-Ray Emission Components from the Quiescent Sun"

[3] "STEREO Observations of Energetic Neutral Hydrogen Atoms During the 2006 December 5 Solar Flare"

[4] "Direct Evidence of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field Effect on the Cosmic-Ray Shadow by the Sun"