A Solar FRB: Difference between revisions
imported>Hhudson (draft of No 400) |
imported>Hhudson No edit summary |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owens_Valley_Radio_Observatory Owens Valley Radio Observatory]. | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owens_Valley_Radio_Observatory Owens Valley Radio Observatory]. | ||
[[File:400f1. | [[File:400f1.png|600px|thumb|center|<b></b> | ||
The original detection of the FRB candidate ST 190506B, which we would have | The original detection of the FRB candidate ST 190506B, which we would have | ||
to call by a solar name like SOL2019-05-06T17:47:35. | to call by a solar name like SOL2019-05-06T17:47:35. | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
with a fast broadband | with a fast broadband | ||
[[File:400f2. | [[File:400f2.png|600px|thumb|center|<b></b> | ||
The EOVSA file graphic for the "solar FRB" event, marked by a red triangle | The EOVSA file graphic for the "solar FRB" event, marked by a red triangle | ||
at the bottom. | at the bottom. | ||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
relatively poor time resolution of the GRB data, 4 s rather than 4 ms. | relatively poor time resolution of the GRB data, 4 s rather than 4 ms. | ||
[[File:400f3. | [[File:400f3.png|600px|thumb|center|<b></b> | ||
The hard X-ray time series (left) and spectrum (right, at the time of the | The hard X-ray time series (left) and spectrum (right, at the time of the | ||
SFRB as marked by the dashed line). The dotted lines show GBM belatedly | SFRB as marked by the dashed line). The dotted lines show GBM belatedly | ||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
detection. | detection. | ||
[[File:400f4. | [[File:400f4.png|600px|thumb|center|<b></b> | ||
Upper, EOVSA time series at fixed frequencies; lower, the spectrogram | Upper, EOVSA time series at fixed frequencies; lower, the spectrogram | ||
with an arrow pointing to the time of the SFRB. | with an arrow pointing to the time of the SFRB. |
Revision as of 16:24, 22 February 2021
Nugget | |
---|---|
Number: | 400 |
1st Author: | Dale GARY |
2nd Author: | Hugh HUDSON |
Published: | 15 February2021 |
Next Nugget: | TBD |
Previous Nugget: | Richard Schwartz |
Introduction
The idea of a "Fast Radio Burst" (FRB) burst upon the astronomical community only 15 years ago: these are remarkbly bright, remarkably fast transient sources. They last for only a few msec! Most of them, quite interestingly, have extragalactic origins, as can be inferred from their frequency dispersion, typically hundreds of pc/cm3. Here the unit pc is the parsec. Many may be associated with magnetars, which links them to both RHESSI and to solar flares.
Recently a very sensitive FRB detector array detected a FRB-like event, but uniquely solar in origin (Ref. [1]). We'll call it the SFRB, for "solar FRB". This event, observed at 1.6 GHz, lasted for only a few ms and thus seemed like a true FRB. Here the dispersion measure, still expressed in parsecs, was a minimal 5 pc/cm3, but consistent with zero (or the whole solar corona, which has a scale height of about 1 nanoparsec. Figure 1 shows the STARE2 array detection by two instruments at the Owens Valley Radio Observatory.
The solar event
Our new solar radio observatory, EOVSA, also at Owens Valley, detected something remarkable at about the right time: Figure 2 shows the file EOVSA spectrogram, with a fast broadband
RHESSI hard X-ray data were not available when this event happened, but [Fermi/GBM] data were, as shown in Figure 3 here. During the SFRB there was hard X-ray emission with extremely hard spectra (index about -2.8), but no coincident spike. The EOVSA data show that the disturbance penetrated to the lower solar atmosphere, and so this non-coincidence likely just results from the relatively poor time resolution of the GRB data, 4 s rather than 4 ms.

The EOVSA data provide the best possible solar radio observational material, which we summarize in Figure 4 here. EOVSA's high time resolution (20 ms samples) still do not resolve the time scale of the STARE2 event (Figure 1), and are achieved by time-sharing, rather than continuous sampling. In this case EOVSA scans were at either 8.25-8.55 GHz or 10.2-10.5 GHz, in any case at much higher frequencies than the 1.6 GHz of the STARE2 detection.
The morphology of the spectrogram in Figure 4 resembles that of type III bursts, normally observed in the corona at much lower frequencies. Here we are seeing source densities, on the plasma-frequency hypothesis, of 1010 cm-3, which is typical of the chromosphere. Such a high density at the base of an open-field flux tube could only be found in a transient, according to conventional wisdom.
What are the implications here?
Once again, we are indebted to non-solar astronomers for pointing out a potentially large unexplored parameter space. The presence of very short time scales also implies very small spatial scales, and current-day numerical simulations of solar atmospheric structure do not address these scales. They are important because they come closer to the microphysics involved in solar plasma dynamics, and this chance observation should really encourage observers to tackle this parameter range.