Scattering Polarization in Solar Flares: Difference between revisions

From HelioWiki Home Page
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hhudson
(Nugget 210, initial entry)
 
imported>Hhudson
No edit summary
Line 39: Line 39:
the subsequent photons emitted from the atoms are linearly polarized.  
the subsequent photons emitted from the atoms are linearly polarized.  


Since we have other evidence for the bombardment of the chromosphere by
Since we have other evidence for the bombardment of the chromosphere byenergetic electron and proton beams, possibly originating in the coronal
energetic electron and proton beams, possibly originating in the coronal
reconnection site, such an explanation of the observed polarization seems to
reconnection site, such an explanation of the observed polarization seems to
be natural.
be natural.
Figure 1 sketches the geometry of the phenomenon.
However, there are theoretical reasons to believe that this
However, there are theoretical reasons to believe that this
process may be not as efficient as previously thought, because of the role
process may be not as efficient as previously thought, because of the role
of the radiation transfer effects and of the depolarizing collisions with
of the radiation transfer effects and of the depolarizing collisions with
the isotropic component of the particles velocity distribution.  
the isotropic component of the particles velocity distribution.
Moreover, the previous models do neglect the geometry of the flare which
The modeling to date has been one-dimensional, relying on the
seems to be of critical importance in for the polarization creation mechanism.
particle transport the vertical (beam) direction to produce the polarization.


[[File:210f2.png|800px|thumb|center|Fig. 1:  
== The model ==
 
There is another natural mechanism that can also provide a good
explanation of the most common observational findings and that can perhaps
explain even more than the impact polarization hypothesis.
Similarly to the process of impact approximation, the atoms can become
polarized after their exposure to anisotropic illumination.
The resulting scattering polarization is a well-known phenomenon in
solar physics and its most familiar manifestation is the existence of the
so-called [http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FIAU%2FIAU4_S259%2FS1
743921309030464a.pdf&code=638cc5bb44947edda467b20ce538f628 Second Solar Spectrum]
(.pdf file).
This is, for example, a linearly polarized spectrum of the continuum and
spectral lines observed near the solar limb which is caused by the
anisotropy of radiation due to
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limb_darkening limb-darkening].
 
[[File:210f1.png|600px|thumb|center|Fig. 1:
The anisotropy of radiation is highest at the edges of the flare
The anisotropy of radiation is highest at the edges of the flare
ribbons. Multi-dimensional radiative transfer calculation is needed for
ribbons. Multi-dimensional radiative transfer calculation is needed for
determination of the amount of this anisotropy.
determination of the amount of this anisotropy.
]]
]]

Revision as of 08:10, 21 October 2013


Nugget
Number:
1st Author: Jiři Štěpàn
2nd Author: Petr Heinzel
Published: October 21, 2013
Next Nugget: TBD
Previous Nugget: The Flare that Time Forgot



Introduction

Fast particles can excite atomic states, resulting in linearly polarized line emission. The detection of any linear polarization during a solar flare could therefore provide key evidence for the existence of a particle beam, in the so-called thick-target model. This polarization, in principle, should appear in the chromosphere, where the thick-target particle beams interact according to the model.

Accordingly, spectropolarimetric observations of strong chromospheric spectral lines (such as the hydrogen H-alpha, Na D2, or Ca II K) have long been sought, with controversial results. Some observations suggest that there is a significant linear polarization of these lines of the order of several percent observed at the edges of the flare ribbons (Reference [1]). Other observers claim no observable signatures at all (Reference [2]). The theory is complicated, but any successful observation would provide a giant step forward for the thick-target model.

We call the direct excitation of polarization "impact polarization." Like any process creating spectral line polarization, impact polarization result from an anisotropy of the medium in which the lines are formed. In particular, the impact-polarization models assume that the distribution of velocities of particles is not isotropic. If the atoms of the plasmas collide with these anisotropically moving particles, the subsequent photons emitted from the atoms are linearly polarized.

Since we have other evidence for the bombardment of the chromosphere byenergetic electron and proton beams, possibly originating in the coronal reconnection site, such an explanation of the observed polarization seems to be natural. However, there are theoretical reasons to believe that this process may be not as efficient as previously thought, because of the role of the radiation transfer effects and of the depolarizing collisions with the isotropic component of the particles velocity distribution. The modeling to date has been one-dimensional, relying on the particle transport the vertical (beam) direction to produce the polarization.

The model

There is another natural mechanism that can also provide a good explanation of the most common observational findings and that can perhaps explain even more than the impact polarization hypothesis. Similarly to the process of impact approximation, the atoms can become polarized after their exposure to anisotropic illumination. The resulting scattering polarization is a well-known phenomenon in solar physics and its most familiar manifestation is the existence of the so-called [http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FIAU%2FIAU4_S259%2FS1 743921309030464a.pdf&code=638cc5bb44947edda467b20ce538f628 Second Solar Spectrum] (.pdf file). This is, for example, a linearly polarized spectrum of the continuum and spectral lines observed near the solar limb which is caused by the anisotropy of radiation due to limb-darkening.

Fig. 1: The anisotropy of radiation is highest at the edges of the flare ribbons. Multi-dimensional radiative transfer calculation is needed for determination of the amount of this anisotropy.