The Slowest Flare
Nugget | |
---|---|
Number: | 180 |
1st Author: | Sam Freeland |
2nd Author: | Hugh Hudson |
Published: | 23 July 2012 |
Next Nugget: | TBD |
Previous Nugget: | Dimmings and Sustained Gamma-Ray Events |
Introduction
A remarkable flare, distinguishable by its very slow rise phase, has just occurred (SOL2012-07-17T17:15, M1.7) near the W limb of the Sun. According to the NOAA database from the GOES X-ray photometers, using the standard definitions of start and peak time, it took this flare 5.2 hours to develop. We show an overview from SDO/AIA and RHESSI in Figure 1. Please refer to the extensive movies showing many dynamic features of this event.

A skeptic might want to describe this as a coincidental superposition of smaller events, perhaps on different parts of the Sun, but in fact the movies linked above show that the entire flare evolution consisted of a single organic process. A search of the GOES database reveals that in fact this event had the longest start-to-peak time interval of any M or X-class flare in the present Hale cycle, in fact since1995 (FIgure 2).
What else went with this event?
Because this flare was a major gradual event, we might expect a CME to have occurred. This happens with about half of the M-class flares, and it happened this time as well (see the movies pages). Furthermore, since this flare occurred near the west limb, an associated CME almost always means an SEP - a particle event. This too was observed. Finally, even better, another (more powerful and more impulsive) flare occurred about a day and a half later (SOL2012-07-19, M7.7), in the same active region. In such a case we may see "CME cannibalism", a phenomenon that may occur when a later faster ejection overtakes an earlier slow ejection out in the heliosphere, in this case about halfway between the Sun and the orbit of Earth.
Energetics
Such an event appears to have no "impulsive phase" with hard X-ray and microwave signatures of powerful energy release into non-thermal particle acceleration. The non-impulsive behavior here may or may not reflect the presence of non-thermal particles, simply because the longer time scale of the event may make them less detectable This event, well-observed by both RHESSI and Fermi in hard X-rays, provides an excellent test case for this question: can slow CMEs also be associated with non-thermal energy release? A detailed study of these data might be rewarding. In a sense the answer is obvious, because we can see the SEPs. But do we see hard X-rays and/or microwaves as well? Figure 3 shows time series of GOES, the GOES temperature, and the EVE observation of the He II 304 A line (the line that dominates the AIA image shown in Figure 1). The temperatures show several peaks approaching 10 MK, consistent with this being a normal flare but one with slow modulations of its development; the He II data provide indirect evidence for the existence of non-thermal particles exciting chromospheric emissions.
Conclusion
We can conclude that yes, this was a remarkably slow-rising event, but no, it probably did not break the flare paradigm particularly. The AIA images show that the W ribbon probably was obscured by the limb, and the initial excitation in the E ribbon by RHESSI and the He II line was as expected; the later emission from the corona (in both bands) shows the development of the standard loop prominence system usually associated with a CME. This was an active-region event, which makes its slow rise still more unusual. Often, especially at solar minimum, we see large, slow, and relative cool flare-like events associated with filament eruptions outside the active latitudes. In extreme cases such events may become "stealth CMEs".